Why does AI hallucinate? One of the most common and perplexing problems that AI systems face is the phenomenon of hallucination, or the generation of false or distorted images, texts, sounds, or other artefacts that do not correspond to reality.
Hallucination can have serious consequences for businesses that rely on AI for decision making, customer service, product development, or content creation. For example, an AI system that hallucinates could produce inaccurate or misleading reports, damage the reputation or brand image of a company, violate ethical or legal standards, or even harm the safety or well-being of users or stakeholders. Therefore, it is crucial for business leaders to understand why AI hallucinates and what can be done to prevent or mitigate it.
AI hallucination is a term that refers to the generation of artefacts by AI systems that do not match the input or the intended output. For example, an AI system that is trained to generate captions for images could hallucinate a caption that describes an object or a scene that is not present in the image, or that contradicts the image.
Similarly, an AI system that is trained to generate text from speech could hallucinate words or sentences that are not spoken by the speaker, or that change the meaning or tone of the speech.
AI hallucination is different from other types of errors or biases that AI systems can exhibit, such as noise, overfitting, underfitting, or unfairness. Noise is the random variation or distortion of data that can affect the accuracy or performance of an AI system.
Overfitting is the situation where an AI system learns too well from the training data, but fails to generalise to new or unseen data. Underfitting is the opposite situation, where an AI system learns too little from the training data, and performs poorly on both the training and the test data. Unfairness is the situation where an AI system produces outputs that are discriminatory or prejudicial against certain groups or individuals, based on their protected attributes, such as gender, race, age, or disability.
AI hallucination is not necessarily caused by noise, overfitting, underfitting, or unfairness, although these factors can exacerbate it. AI hallucination is more related to the inherent limitations or assumptions of the AI models and algorithms, and the way they are trained and evaluated. AI hallucination can also be influenced by the context and the expectations of the users or the stakeholders, who may have different interpretations or preferences for the AI outputs. Therefore, AI hallucination is a complex and multifaceted problem that requires a holistic and systematic approach to address it.
There are many factors that can contribute to AI hallucination, but we will focus on four of the most important ones: data quality, model architecture, training methods, and evaluation metrics.
Data quality: The quality of the data that is used to train and test an AI system is crucial for its performance and reliability. If the data is incomplete, inconsistent, noisy, or biased, it can lead to AI hallucination. For example, if the data contains errors, gaps, or outliers, the AI system may learn to generate artefacts that reflect these anomalies. If the data is not representative of the real-world distribution or diversity, the AI system may learn to generate artefacts that are skewed or biased towards certain classes or categories. If the data is not aligned or matched between the input and the output domains, the AI system may learn to generate artefacts that are irrelevant or incompatible with the input or the intended output.
Model architecture: The architecture of the AI model, or the way it is designed and structured, can also affect its propensity to hallucinate. Different AI models have different strengths and weaknesses, and different levels of complexity and flexibility. For example, some AI models are more suitable for capturing the global or the local features of the data, while others are more suitable for capturing the semantic or the syntactic aspects of the data. Some AI models are more prone to overfitting or underfitting, while others are more robust or adaptable. Some AI models are more transparent or interpretable, while others are more opaque or black-box. Depending on the task and the data, the choice of the AI model can have a significant impact on the quality and the validity of the generated artefacts.
Training methods: The training methods, or the way the AI model is optimised and updated, can also influence its tendency to hallucinate. Different training methods have different objectives and constraints, and different trade-offs and challenges. For example, some training methods are more focused on minimising the loss or the error between the generated and the target outputs, while others are more focused on maximising the likelihood or the probability of the generated outputs. Some training methods are more sensitive to the initialisation or the hyperparameters of the AI model, while others are more stable or robust. Some training methods are more susceptible to adversarial attacks or perturbations, while others are more resilient or resistant. Depending on the task and the data, the choice of the training method can have a significant impact on the robustness and the reliability of the generated artefacts.
Evaluation metrics: The evaluation metrics, or the way the AI system is assessed and validated, can also affect its likelihood to hallucinate. Different evaluation metrics have different criteria and standards, and different advantages and disadvantages. For example, some evaluation metrics are more quantitative or objective, while others are more qualitative or subjective. Some evaluation metrics are more based on the similarity or the distance between the generated and the target outputs, while others are more based on the relevance or the usefulness of the generated outputs. Some evaluation metrics are more aligned or consistent with the human perception or judgement, while others are more divergent or discrepant. Depending on the task and the data, the choice of the evaluation metric can have a significant impact on the feedback and the improvement of the generated artefacts.
There is no single or simple solution for reducing or avoiding AI hallucination, but there are some best practices and strategies that can help to mitigate or prevent it. We will discuss four of the most effective ones: data augmentation, adversarial training, explainability, and human oversight.
Data augmentation: Data augmentation is the process of increasing the quantity and the quality of the data that is used to train and test an AI system, by applying various transformations or modifications to the original data. Data augmentation can help to reduce or avoid AI hallucination, by enhancing the diversity and the representativeness of the data, and by reducing the noise and the bias of the data. For example, data augmentation can be used to generate new or synthetic data that covers the missing or the rare cases, or that balances the skewed or the imbalanced classes. Data augmentation can also be used to apply random or targeted perturbations to the data, such as cropping, flipping, rotating, scaling, or adding noise, to increase the robustness and the generalisability of the AI system.
Adversarial training: Adversarial training is the process of improving the performance and the reliability of an AI system, by exposing it to adversarial examples or attacks, which are intentionally designed to fool or mislead the AI system. Adversarial training can help to reduce or avoid AI hallucination, by enhancing the stability and the resilience of the AI system, and by reducing the overfitting and the underfitting of the AI system. For example, adversarial training can be used to generate adversarial examples that exploit the weaknesses or the vulnerabilities of the AI system, such as adding subtle or imperceptible changes to the input, or generating outputs that are semantically or syntactically incorrect. Adversarial training can also be used to train the AI system to detect or correct the adversarial examples, by using a min-max game or a co-operative game between the AI system and an adversary.
Explainability: Explainability is the process of providing the rationale or the justification for the outputs or the decisions of an AI system, by using various methods or techniques to interpret or understand the AI system. Explainability can help to reduce or avoid AI hallucination, by enhancing the transparency and the accountability of the AI system, and by reducing the opacity and the ambiguity of the AI system. For example, explainability can be used to provide the features or the factors that contribute to the generation of the outputs, such as highlighting the relevant or the influential parts of the input, or providing the weights or the scores of the output components. Explainability can also be used to provide the alternatives or the counterfactuals for the generation of the outputs, such as showing the outputs that would have been generated if the input or the parameters were changed, or providing the outputs that are closest or farthest from the generated outputs. Read more about XAI here.
Human oversight: Human oversight is the process of involving the human users or the stakeholders in the development and the deployment of an AI system, by using various mechanisms or tools to monitor or control the AI system. Human oversight can help to reduce or avoid AI hallucination, by enhancing the trust and the confidence of the human users or the stakeholders, and by reducing the uncertainty and the risk of the AI system. For example, human oversight can be used to provide the feedback or the guidance for the improvement of the AI system, such as rating or reviewing the quality or the validity of the outputs, or suggesting or correcting the errors or the artefacts of the outputs. Human oversight can also be used to provide the consent or the permission for the use of the AI system, such as setting or adjusting the preferences or the boundaries of the outputs, or accepting or rejecting the outputs or the decisions of the AI system.
AI hallucination is a serious and complex problem that can affect the quality and the reliability of the outputs generated by AI systems. AI hallucination can have negative consequences for businesses that rely on AI for decision making, customer service, product development, or content creation. Therefore, it is important for business leaders to understand why AI hallucinates and what can be done to prevent or mitigate it.
In this essay, we have discussed the causes and solutions of AI hallucination from the perspective. We have identified four main factors that contribute to AI hallucination: data quality, model architecture, training methods, and evaluation metrics. We have also suggested four best practices and strategies for reducing or avoiding AI hallucination: data augmentation, adversarial training, explainability, and human oversight. We hope that this will help leaders to leverage AI in a responsible and trustworthy manner, and to avoid the pitfalls and the risks of AI hallucination.
Plaud Review 2026: What Is Plaud, How Plaud AI Works, and Should You Choose Plaud Note or Plaud Note Pro? Plaud is an AI note taking ecosystem that pairs dedicated recording devices with cloud based processing via Plaud Intelligence. On its UK site, Plaud positions itself as “The World’s No.1
Is AI bad for the environment? AI has real environmental costs. Training and running models increases electricity demand, data centres consume water for cooling, and specialised hardware depends on minerals with mining impacts on land and at sea. At the same time, AI can accelerate research in health, materials and
How is AI impacting Financial Services? By John Reynolds – Financial Services Transformation How AI Is Impacting Financial Services? Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a future trend in financial services; it is a present reality that is reshaping how firms operate, serve customers, and manage risk. From chatbots that
What is Embodied Ai? Artificial Intelligence (AI) is often thought of as a purely digital technology. Most people associate it with chatbots, voice assistants, or text‑based systems such as ChatGPT. But AI is no longer confined to screens. Increasingly, intelligence is meeting the physical world through what experts call Embodied
What is the UK-US Tech Prosperity Deal? On 18 September 2025, London hosted the signing of the UK-US Technology Prosperity Deal, a wide-ranging agreement that promises to reshape the global landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing and civil nuclear energy. Valued at over £150 billion, the deal is being
What is Agentic AI and Why It Matters? Artificial intelligence has come a long way from being a set of clever algorithms hidden in the background of everyday tools. For decades, most AI was reactive. It waited for human instruction and then responded within narrow boundaries. Today, however, the field
You must be logged in to post a comment.